The article, which can be seen in its entirety here, reported a sexual assault that had happened on the U of S campus. My alma mater.
Now, I'm sure this isn't an isolated incident. I'm sure sexual assaults were occurring while I was
The line that sticks out for me, however, is this:
The woman wasn't physically harmed during the incident.
Um... what?
Boys & girls, I am aware that there are many different levels of sexual assault. The Canadian Criminal Code definition:
Somebody touches you in a sexual way on purpose, directly or indirectly, without your consent.Someone grabbing my boob could be charged with sexual assault. Or brushing up against my backside {Former Rider Tillman can attest to this...but enough about that}. Rape is also now included under the broad spectrum of "sexual assault".
I don't know exactly what happened to this woman. I don't know to what "degree" she was assaulted, or where the man touched her {& with what part of his body he used}. All I know is when you include a phrase like that, you are, in essence, dismissing what she went through. "She wasn't physically harmed, so what's the big deal?"
Ok, maybe she doesn't have a broken arm, or a black eye, or cuts, or a concussion, but when reporting things of this nature, you have to be damned careful the words you use, the tone that can be interpreted, & the language in which you describe the event & the victim.
Am I over-reacting?
No comments:
Post a Comment
"Do not think of knocking out another person's brains because he differs in opinion from you. It would be as rational to knock yourself on the head because you differ from yourself ten years ago." Horace Mann